See if you can follow this bit of dysfunction. A student assaults other students at school. The substitute teacher intervenes. The parent complains. So, the school district administration, blames the contracted substitute teacher. The company that employs the contracted teacher, clears that substitute teacher of all wrong doing. The school district bans the contracted substitute teacher from working in that district, to avoid conflict with the parent who complained. What do the students learn from this? Especially the one who committed the assault? Perhaps hurting people is his right? Also noteworthy, is that contracted employees are disposable.
The thoughts of a writer.
Comments